Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk Approve 48% 24% 74% 47% 46% 49% 43% 73% Disapprove 44 69 17 45 47 41 49 20 DK/NA 8 6 9 8 6 10 7 6 AGE IN YRS....... INCOME............. POL PHIL......... 18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con Approve 58% 44% 44% 49% 46% 48% 73% 58% 24% Disapprove 34 50 45 40 48 47 17 34 70 DK/NA 8 6 10 11 6 5 9 9 6 WHITE............. NoColl Coll BrnAgn Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath Approve 48% 48% 33% 39% 38% Disapprove 43 46 58 54 55 DK/NA 9 6 9 7 7
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk Obama 42% 10% 81% 37% 40% 43% 33% 84% Reps in Congress 41 75 12 39 42 40 48 9 DK/NA 18 15 7 25 18 17 19 7 AGE IN YRS....... INCOME............. POL PHIL......... 18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con Obama 50% 39% 39% 44% 39% 42% 74% 48% 18% Reps in Congress 38 44 39 38 46 43 17 29 67 DK/NA 12 17 22 18 15 15 9 22 15 WHITE............. NoColl Coll BrnAgn Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath Obama 41% 44% 19% 25% 33% Reps in Congress 41 41 60 54 49 DK/NA 19 14 22 21 18
Jan 14 Dec 22 Dec 9 Nov 19 Oct 8 Aug 5 July 1 2010 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 President Obama 42 45 44 45 47 46 53 Reps in Congress 41 40 37 36 31 37 33 DK/NA 18 16 19 19 21 16 14
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk Mostly approve 34% 9% 68% 26% 31% 36% 26% 70% Mostly disapprove 54 84 19 59 58 51 63 19 DK/NA 12 7 13 15 11 13 12 11 AGE IN YRS....... INCOME............. POL PHIL......... 18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con Mostly approve 39% 33% 31% 36% 31% 33% 56% 38% 16% Mostly disapprove 47 58 55 48 64 59 28 49 77 DK/NA 14 9 15 16 5 8 16 13 7 WHITE............. NoColl Coll BrnAgn Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath Mostly approve 32% 38% 15% 20% 29% Mostly disapprove 54 55 73 67 62 DK/NA 14 7 11 13 8
Jan 14 Dec 22 Dec 9 2010 2009 2009 Mostly approve 34 36 38 Mostly disapprove 54 53 52 DK/NA 12 11 10
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk Too far 44% 69% 16% 44% 45% 42% 50% 20% Not far enough 29 14 41 33 31 27 25 38 About right 17 6 33 14 15 19 14 37 DK/NA 10 10 10 9 9 11 10 5 AGE IN YRS....... INCOME............. POL PHIL......... 18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con Too far 38% 47% 44% 39% 50% 51% 19% 37% 65% Not far enough 33 28 28 30 30 25 44 33 17 About right 22 15 17 19 12 17 28 20 9 DK/NA 7 10 12 12 7 6 9 10 9 WHITE............. NoColl Coll BrnAgn STAND ON HC PLAN Q26 Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath App Dis Too far 42% 48% 62% 56% 51% 7% 74% Not far enough 28 31 18 22 21 45 19 About right 18 15 11 12 20 43 2 DK/NA 11 6 9 10 8 5 5
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk Support 59% 34% 82% 61% 56% 62% 54% 78% Oppose 35 59 12 34 40 31 41 15 DK/NA 6 7 5 5 4 7 5 7 AGE IN YRS....... INCOME............. POL PHIL......... 18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con Support 68% 59% 53% 62% 57% 57% 85% 69% 35% Oppose 31 36 39 32 38 41 11 26 59 DK/NA 1 5 8 5 5 2 4 5 6 WHITE............. NoColl Coll BrnAgn Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath Support 59% 59% 45% 49% 53% Oppose 35 37 51 46 40 DK/NA 6 4 4 6 7
Jan 14 Dec 22 Dec 9 Nov 19 Oct 8 Aug 5 July 1 2010 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 Support 59 56 56 57 61 62 69 Oppose 35 38 38 35 34 32 26 DK/NA 6 6 6 8 6 6 5
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk Legal all cases 18% 8% 25% 20% 15% 21% 17% 24% Legal most cases 34 25 45 36 36 33 33 37 Illegal most cases 24 34 15 23 26 22 26 21 Illegal all cases 18 29 11 15 17 20 19 17 DK/NA 5 4 4 5 5 4 5 1 AGE IN YRS....... INCOME............. POL PHIL......... 18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con Legal all cases 19% 21% 14% 17% 19% 21% 32% 21% 8% Legal most cases 34 38 30 32 37 43 45 42 23 Illegal most cases 24 23 27 25 25 23 13 22 33 Illegal all cases 20 14 22 22 14 11 7 9 33 DK/NA 3 4 6 4 5 2 3 6 4 WHITE............. NoColl Coll BrnAgn Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath Legal all cases 17% 22% 8% 13% 15% Legal most cases 35 34 18 29 35 Illegal most cases 23 27 36 30 27 Illegal all cases 20 13 34 23 20 DK/NA 5 4 3 6 4
COMBINED LEGAL ALL & MOST CASES High Low Jan 14 May 14 Jul 17 Aug 16 May 3 Jul 17 Jan 14 2010 2009 2008 2007 2007 2008* 2010** Legal all cases 18 15 19 21 17 19 18 Legal most cases 34 37 38 36 37 38 34 Illegal most cases 24 27 24 24 26 24 24 Illegal all cases 18 14 14 13 13 14 18 DK/NA 5 7 5 6 7 5 5
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk Support 27% 10% 47% 26% 29% 26% 24% 41% Oppose 67 87 47 67 65 68 70 52 DK/NA 6 3 7 7 6 6 6 8 AGE IN YRS....... INCOME............. POL PHIL......... 18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con Support 30% 26% 26% 26% 28% 33% 53% 30% 12% Oppose 64 69 67 68 68 64 40 64 85 DK/NA 5 5 7 6 4 3 7 7 3 WHITE............. STAND ON ABORTION Q29 NoColl Coll BrnAgn COMBINED ALL&MOST CASES Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath Legal Illegal Support 25% 34% 11% 19% 23% 45% 7% Oppose 69 61 86 75 71 49 90 DK/NA 6 4 3 5 6 6 3
Jan 14 Dec 22 2010 2009 Support 27 23 Oppose 67 72 DK/NA 6 5
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk Right thing 59% 74% 49% 58% 67% 52% 63% 42% Shouldn't be inv 35 20 43 37 29 40 31 56 DK/NA 6 6 8 6 5 8 7 3 AGE IN YRS....... INCOME............. POL PHIL......... 18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con Right thing 57% 59% 59% 52% 67% 69% 48% 60% 66% Shouldn't be inv 40 35 32 42 27 27 47 34 28 DK/NA 3 5 9 6 5 4 5 6 6 WHITE............. NoColl Coll BrnAgn Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath Right thing 57% 65% 65% 67% 60% Shouldn't be inv 37 29 27 25 35 DK/NA 7 6 8 7 5
Jan 14 Dec 23 Dec 8 Nov 18 Oct 7 2010 2009 2009 2009 2009 Right thing 59 51 57 48 52 Shouldn't be inv 35 41 35 41 37 DK/NA 6 8 8 11 11
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk Very likely 35% 44% 23% 36% 35% 35% 36% 29% Smwht likely 43 42 43 46 39 47 44 43 Not very likely 16 11 25 12 19 12 15 18 Not likely at all 4 2 6 3 4 3 3 5 DK/NA 2 2 3 3 2 3 2 5 AGE IN YRS....... INCOME............. POL PHIL......... 18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con Very likely 23% 37% 42% 34% 36% 32% 18% 31% 49% Smwht likely 43 45 42 44 44 45 46 46 40 Not very likely 27 13 11 16 17 19 30 17 7 Not likely at all 5 3 3 4 2 3 5 4 2 DK/NA 2 1 3 2 2 1 2 2 3 WHITE............. NoColl Coll BrnAgn Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath Very likely 38% 28% 43% 39% 38% Smwht likely 43 45 42 47 38 Not very likely 14 21 11 10 19 Not likely at all 3 4 2 2 2 DK/NA 3 2 2 1 3
Jan 14 Jul 28 May 5 Feb 21 Dec 10 2010 2005 2004 2002 2001 Very likely 35 40 26 31 31 Somewhat likely 43 45 50 49 43 Not very likely 16 10 16 14 17 Not likely at all 4 4 5 3 7 DK/NA 2 1 3 4 3
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk Criminal court 34% 20% 50% 31% 31% 37% 32% 39% Military court 59 76 42 62 64 55 62 53 DK/NA 7 4 8 7 5 8 6 7 AGE IN YRS....... INCOME............. POL PHIL......... 18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con Criminal court 36% 36% 31% 39% 31% 31% 53% 35% 21% Military court 58 59 61 54 65 63 36 58 75 DK/NA 6 6 8 7 5 6 10 6 4 WHITE............. NoColl Coll BrnAgn Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath Criminal court 35% 32% 25% 25% 30% Military court 58 62 70 68 65 DK/NA 7 7 6 7 5
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk Yes 28% 12% 51% 24% 27% 29% 25% 46% No 60 81 35 64 68 54 65 39 DK/NA 11 7 14 12 5 17 10 14 AGE IN YRS....... INCOME............. POL PHIL......... 18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con Yes 32% 26% 29% 30% 27% 30% 52% 30% 13% No 55 64 61 56 67 62 36 59 78 DK/NA 12 10 11 14 6 8 12 11 9 WHITE............. NoColl Coll BrnAgn Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath Yes 26% 36% 13% 19% 26% No 62 57 76 69 68 DK/NA 12 8 11 12 6
Jan 14 Nov 12 2010 2008 Yes 28 29 No 60 44 DK/NA 11 27
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk Gone too far 25% 17% 29% 28% 28% 22% 23% 34% Not gone far enough 63 72 57 60 61 64 65 59 DK/NA 12 10 14 12 11 13 12 8 AGE IN YRS....... INCOME............. POL PHIL......... 18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con Gone too far 35% 25% 17% 28% 23% 25% 35% 22% 21% Not gone far enough 53 64 70 60 67 65 50 65 69 DK/NA 13 11 12 13 10 10 15 12 10 WHITE............. NoColl Coll BrnAgn Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath Gone too far 25% 25% 20% 18% 19% Not gone far enough 64 61 69 70 71 DK/NA 11 14 11 12 11
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk Support 86% 92% 86% 83% 83% 89% 86% 85% Oppose 11 6 11 13 14 8 11 13 DK/NA 3 2 2 4 3 3 3 1 AGE IN YRS....... INCOME............. POL PHIL......... 18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con Support 80% 88% 88% 87% 87% 84% 86% 89% 86% Oppose 18 9 8 11 11 14 12 10 10 DK/NA 1 3 4 3 3 2 2 1 4 WHITE............. NoColl Coll BrnAgn Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath Support 88% 82% 91% 90% 87% Oppose 10 14 7 7 11 DK/NA 3 3 3 4 2
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk Yes 84% 88% 86% 80% 85% 84% 85% 81% No 13 9 13 17 13 13 12 19 DK/NA 3 3 1 3 2 3 3 - AGE IN YRS....... INCOME............. POL PHIL......... 18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con Yes 80% 86% 87% 86% 84% 85% 81% 85% 85% No 19 12 9 11 14 14 17 13 11 DK/NA 1 2 4 3 3 1 2 2 4 WHITE............. NoColl Coll BrnAgn Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath Yes 86% 80% 88% 86% 86% No 12 16 9 10 10 DK/NA 2 4 3 3 4
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk Yes 52% 67% 39% 53% 57% 48% 58% 33% No 44 31 57 43 40 47 38 66 DK/NA 4 2 3 4 2 5 3 1 AGE IN YRS....... INCOME............. POL PHIL......... 18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con Yes 35% 55% 65% 48% 58% 59% 33% 49% 69% No 63 43 30 48 41 38 64 48 29 DK/NA 2 2 5 4 1 3 4 4 3 WHITE............. NoColl Coll BrnAgn Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath Yes 53% 51% 62% 62% 65% No 44 45 35 34 30 DK/NA 3 4 3 4 5
Jan 14 Aug 29 2010 2006 Yes 52 60 No 44 37 DK/NA 4 4
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Wht Blk Good idea 79% 89% 71% 79% 81% 77% 83% 66% Bad idea 16 8 22 17 15 16 13 27 DK/NA 5 3 7 4 4 6 4 7 AGE IN YRS....... INCOME............. POL PHIL......... 18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con Good idea 67% 83% 86% 76% 82% 87% 66% 78% 89% Bad idea 29 13 9 19 13 11 27 18 7 DK/NA 4 5 5 4 5 2 6 4 3 WHITE............. NoColl Coll BrnAgn Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath Good idea 80% 78% 84% 86% 89% Bad idea 15 17 12 9 8 DK/NA 5 5 4 5 3