LIKELY VOTERS......................... Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Corzine 40% 8% 76% 32% 36% 44% Christie 41 83 11 41 43 39 Daggett 14 7 10 20 17 11 SMONE ELSE(VOL) - - - - - - WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) - - - - - - DK/NA 5 2 3 8 4 6 Philly Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore Corzine 57% 46% 30% 44% 28% Christie 23 40 46 33 56 Daggett 11 11 18 18 12 SMONE ELSE(VOL) - - - - - WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) - - - - - DK/NA 9 3 6 5 4
LIKELY VOTERS......................... Oct 14 Sep 30 Sep 1 Aug 11 Jul 14 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 Corzine 40 39 37 40 38 Christie 41 43 47 46 47 Daggett 14 12 9 7 8 SMONE ELSE(VOL) - - - - - WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) - - - - - DK/NA 5 6 6 6 7 INDEPENDENT LIKELY VOTERS............. Oct 14 Sep 30 Sep 1 Aug 11 Jul 14 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 Corzine 32 32 30 25 24 Christie 41 45 46 55 54 Daggett 20 16 16 13 13 SMONE ELSE(VOL) - - - - - WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) - - - - - DK/NA 8 7 8 7 9
LIKELY VOTERS......................... CANDIDATE CHOICE GIVEN Q1............. Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Made up 72% 78% 75% 64% 70% 73% Might change 27 21 23 34 29 25 DK/NA 1 1 2 1 1 2 CAND CHOICE Q1.... Corz Chris Dagg Made up 75% 80% 39% Might change 24 20 59 DK/NA 2 1 2
LIKELY VOTERS DAGGETT Q1 Corzine 33% Christie 40 Someone else 4 No one/WLDN'T VOTE 13 DK/NA 10
LIKELY VOTERS......................... Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Favorable 38% 72% 11% 39% 41% 35% Unfavorable 40 14 64 36 37 42 Hvn't hrd enough 20 14 24 22 19 21 REFUSED 2 1 2 3 3 2 Philly Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore Favorable 23% 37% 42% 33% 48% Unfavorable 45 40 38 47 31 Hvn't hrd enough 26 21 18 18 20 REFUSED 6 2 2 2 1
LIKELY VOTERS......................... Oct 14 Sep 30 Sep 1 Aug 11 Jul 14 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 Favorable 38 38 41 42 39 Unfavorable 40 38 30 26 20 Hvn't hrd enough 20 22 27 30 40 REFUSED 2 2 2 3 1
LIKELY VOTERS......................... Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Favorable 40% 8% 72% 32% 38% 42% Unfavorable 53 89 22 57 56 51 Hvn't hrd enough 4 2 3 6 4 3 REFUSED 3 1 3 5 2 4 Philly Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore Favorable 58% 45% 27% 48% 28% Unfavorable 33 48 64 49 65 Hvn't hrd enough 6 4 6 - 4 REFUSED 3 3 4 3 4
LIKELY VOTERS......................... Oct 14 Sep 30 Sep 1 Aug 11 Jul 14 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 Favorable 40 34 34 37 34 Unfavorable 53 56 57 54 58 Hvn't hrd enough 4 6 6 6 6 REFUSED 3 4 3 2 2
LIKELY VOTERS......................... Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Favorable 19% 17% 15% 26% 23% 16% Unfavorable 7 7 11 4 7 8 Hvn't hrd enough 73 76 74 70 70 75 REFUSED 1 - 1 1 1 1 Philly Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore Favorable 15% 15% 23% 24% 20% Unfavorable 8 8 8 5 7 Hvn't hrd enough 76 77 69 69 71 REFUSED 1 1 - 1 2
LIKELY VOTERS......................... Oct 14 Sep 30 Sep 1 Aug 11 Jul 14 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 Favorable 19 11 8 4 5 Unfavorable 7 3 4 3 2 Hvn't hrd enough 73 84 87 92 92 REFUSED 1 1 1 1 1
LIKELY VOTERS......................... Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Approve 39% 10% 65% 34% 37% 41% Disapprove 56 87 27 62 60 52 DK/NA 5 2 7 5 3 7 Philly Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore Approve 58% 41% 34% 42% 27% Disapprove 33 54 63 52 70 DK/NA 9 5 4 6 3
LIKELY VOTERS......................... Oct 14 Sep 30 Sep 1 Aug 11 Jul 14 2009 2009 2009 2009 2009 Approve 39 36 34 36 33 Disapprove 56 58 60 58 60 DK/NA 5 7 6 6 7
LIKELY VOTERS............ CAND CHOICE Q1.... Tot Corz Chris Dagg Doing/Done good job/Good track record 5% 11% - 2% Trying hard/Doing best he can 4 7 1 2 Experience/Background 3 6 1 - Party/Political Philosophy 5 9 1 6 Strong leadership qualities 1 2 1 1 Effective/Gets things done 1 1 - 1 Intelligent/Knowledgeable 2 3 1 1 Offers specific policy proposals - 1 - - Decisive/Good decision maker 1 1 - - Business approach 5 5 4 5 Not beholden/Rich/Paid his way 1 1 1 1 Doesn't take salary 1 1 1 3 Cares about NJ/The people/ Compassionate 3 6 1 1 Honest/Straightforward/Sincere/ Man of his word 6 10 3 6 Courageous/Strong/Outspoken/Does what he believes is right 1 1 1 - Down to earth/Regular guy 1 1 1 1 Personality/Charisma 1 - - 4 Stand on issues general - 1 - - Education 5 8 1 4 Budget/Finances 2 3 1 3 Economy/Jobs 1 2 - 2 Property taxes 1 - - 1 Abortion - 1 - - Issues other 3 6 1 4 Like EVERYTHING 1 2 - - Like NOTHING 29 2 56 35 Other 4 3 6 1 DK/NA 14 7 17 14
LIKELY VOTERS............ CAND CHOICE Q1.... Tot Corz Chris Dagg Not doing good job/Doing nothing for NJ/Bad track record 6% 5% 6% 9% Hasn't kept promises 5 1 7 10 Typical politician/Insider Politician 1 1 1 3 Party/Political Philosophy 3 1 5 3 Not a strong leader/Weak 3 4 2 2 Vague on issues/No clear plan 2 2 1 5 Business background/Goldman Sachs/ Wall Street ties 2 2 1 1 Bad decision maker/Reckless/Rash 1 2 1 1 Running negative campaign 1 1 1 1 Doesn't care about NJ/The people 1 1 1 - Not honest/Lies/Can't trust him/ Hypocritical 6 2 9 7 Political Corruption/Scandals/ Above the law 3 2 3 3 Personality/ Arrogant 2 1 2 1 Too wealthy/Can't relate to average person/Out of touch 3 2 4 4 Appearance/Weight/Health - - 1 - Stand on issues general 1 - 2 2 Education 1 1 - 1 Budget/Finances/Didn't cut spending enough 6 6 6 9 Economy/Jobs 2 1 1 5 Taxes/Tax plan 14 10 19 14 Property taxes 6 7 6 2 Issues other 4 6 4 3 Dislike EVERYTHING 3 - 5 3 Dislike NOTHING 8 19 2 0 Other 4 3 4 5 DK/NA 11 18 2 6
LIKELY VOTERS............ CAND CHOICE Q1.... Tot Corz Chris Dagg Doing/Done good job/Good track record 6% 5% 7% 6% Fighting corruption 6 2 10 8 Experience/Background 3 2 4 3 Party/Political Philosophy 4 1 7 5 Not Corzine 4 1 7 5 Will bring change 7 2 13 9 Strong leadership qualities - - - 1 Effective/Gets things done 1 1 1 - Intelligent/Knowledgeable - - 1 - Offers specific policy proposals - - 1 1 Cares about NJ/The people/ Compassionate 1 1 1 - Honest/Straightforward/Sincere/ Man of his word 5 1 10 1 Courageous/Strong/Outspoken/Does what he believes is right 1 1 1 - Down to earth/Regular guy 1 1 1 2 Personality/Charisma 1 1 - - Stand on issues general 1 1 2 - Crime 1 - 1 1 Budget/Finances 1 - 3 - Taxes/Tax plan 4 1 9 1 Property taxes 1 - 3 - Women's issues 1 - 1 1 Abortion - 1 - 1 Issues other 2 1 2 2 Like EVERYTHING - - - - Like NOTHING 21 40 2 31 Other 4 4 4 4 DK/NA 22 34 8 16
LIKELY VOTERS............ CAND CHOICE Q1.... Tot Corz Chris Dagg Not doing good job/Doing nothing for NJ/Bad track record 1% 1% 1% 3% Hasn't kept promises - - 1 - Typical politician/Insider Politician 3 3 4 1 Lack of experience 2 2 2 1 Party/Political Philosophy 6 6 3 12 Ties to Bush 1 2 - 3 Not a strong leader/Weak 1 1 1 1 Vague on issues/No clear plan 5 4 6 6 Running negative campaign 4 3 4 4 Running weak campaign 2 1 4 1 Doesn't care about NJ/The people - - - 1 Not honest/Lies/Can't trust him/ Hypocritical 11 16 5 16 Political Corruption/Scandals/ Above the law 5 4 3 14 Personality/Arrogant 2 3 1 5 Too wealthy/Can't relate to average person/Out of touch - - - 1 Appearance/Weight/Health 3 1 6 1 Stand on issues general 2 4 - 1 Education 2 2 - 2 Economy/Jobs - - - 1 Taxes/Tax plan 1 - 1 1 Women's issues 1 2 - 1 Abortion 1 1 1 - Issues other 5 7 3 2 Dislike EVERYTHING 2 3 - 1 Dislike NOTHING 12 4 24 2 Other 5 7 5 5 DK/NA 22 21 22 13
LIKELY VOTERS............ CAND CHOICE Q1.... Tot Corz Chris Dagg Experience/Background - - - 1 Party/Political Philosophy 1 - 1 3 Independent/Non partisan/No party ties 8 6 6 25 Will bring change 3 1 1 15 Intelligent/Knowledgeable 1 1 1 1 Offers specific policy proposals 3 2 2 9 Running positive/Good campaign - - - 1 Cares about NJ/The people/ Compassionate 1 1 1 1 Honest/Straightforward/Sincere/ Man of his word 4 3 2 10 Courageous/Strong/Outspoken/Does what he believes is right 1 1 - 1 Down to earth/Regular guy 1 - 1 2 Personality/Charisma 1 - 1 - Stand on issues general 1 - 1 3 Economy/Jobs - - - 1 Taxes/Tax plan 1 - 1 5 Property taxes 1 - 2 3 Issues other 1 1 - 1 Like EVERYTHING - - - 1 Like NOTHING 2 2 2 1 Other 2 1 2 4 DK/NA 68 81 73 12
LIKELY VOTERS............ CAND CHOICE Q1.... Tot Corz Chris Dagg Typical politician/Insider Politician - - - 1 Lack of experience 2 1 1 9 Can't win/Spoiler 6 3 9 5 Party/Political Philosophy 1 1 - 3 Not a strong leader/Weak - - - 1 Vague on issues/No specific plan 1 1 - 2 Running weak campaign 1 1 1 3 Doesn't care about NJ/People - 1 - - Stand on issues general - - - 1 Education - - - 1 Taxes/Tax plan 1 1 1 2 Issues other - - - 1 Dislike EVERYTHING - 1 - - Dislike NOTHING 8 5 7 23 Other 2 2 2 6 DK/NA 75 83 77 44
LIKELY VOTERS......................... Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Yes 45% 18% 69% 41% 47% 42% No 48 74 24 51 48 48 DK/NA 7 8 7 7 5 10 Philly Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore Yes 59% 51% 37% 46% 31% No 34 42 54 44 63 DK/NA 7 6 9 10 6
LIKELY VOTERS......................... Oct 14 Sep 30 Sep 1 Oct 19 Sep 28 2009 2009 2009 2005 2005 Yes 45 44 40 53 55 No 48 45 51 29 25 DK/NA 7 11 10 18 20
LIKELY VOTERS......................... Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Yes 42% 69% 20% 44% 48% 36% No 40 16 60 39 39 41 DK/NA 18 15 21 17 13 23 Philly Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore Yes 36% 44% 47% 33% 46% No 38 40 33 50 39 DK/NA 26 17 20 17 15
LIKELY VOTERS........ Oct 14 Sep 30 Sep 1 2009 2009 2009 Yes 42 37 44 No 40 36 31 DK/NA 18 27 25
LIKELY VOTERS......................... Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Yes 29% 28% 23% 36% 35% 24% No 8 8 9 5 9 7 DK/NA 63 64 68 59 56 70 Philly Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore Yes 22% 25% 32% 35% 32% No 6 5 7 6 15 DK/NA 72 70 61 59 53
LIKELY VOTERS......................... Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Go up 62% 86% 43% 64% 63% 61% Go down 5 1 11 1 5 4 Stay about same 30 11 42 32 28 31 DK/NA 3 3 4 3 3 3 Philly Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore Go up 46% 60% 71% 60% 69% Go down 7 5 2 9 2 Stay about same 41 30 26 28 28 DK/NA 6 5 1 3 2
LIKELY VOTERS Oct 14 Sep 30 2009 2009 Go up 62 61 Go down 5 3 Stay about same 30 32 DK/NA 3 4
LIKELY VOTERS......................... Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Go up 35% 18% 51% 34% 33% 38% Go down 16 29 7 16 18 15 Stay about the same 40 45 32 43 43 37 DK/NA 8 7 10 7 7 10 Philly Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore Go up 34% 35% 37% 38% 34% Go down 13 18 13 15 21 Stay about the same 36 41 47 36 39 DK/NA 17 7 4 11 7
LIKELY VOTERS Oct 14 Sep 30 2009 2009 Go up 35 34 Go down 16 9 Stay about same 40 46 DK/NA 8 11
LIKELY VOTERS......................... Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Go up 22% 19% 25% 21% 23% 20% Go down 11 13 11 11 14 8 Stay about the same 32 30 28 39 36 29 DK/NA 35 39 36 29 27 42 Philly Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore Go up 21% 17% 30% 20% 23% Go down 4 13 8 15 12 Stay about the same 37 32 34 27 32 DK/NA 38 38 28 38 33
LIKELY VOTERS......................... Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Agree 59% 83% 33% 68% 63% 54% Disagree 35 12 59 27 32 38 DK/NA 6 5 8 5 5 8 Philly Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore Agree 41% 56% 66% 56% 68% Disagree 48 37 28 37 28 DK/NA 11 7 5 7 5
LIKELY VOTERS......................... Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Agree 59% 42% 70% 62% 65% 53% Disagree 25 44 13 24 23 27 DK/NA 16 15 17 14 12 20 Philly Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore Agree 60% 57% 62% 61% 57% Disagree 17 28 22 25 29 DK/NA 23 16 16 14 14
LIKELY VOTERS......................... Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Agree 77% 83% 79% 75% 84% 71% Disagree 19 14 18 21 14 24 DK/NA 3 3 3 3 2 5 Philly Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore Agree 67% 81% 78% 71% 82% Disagree 26 15 19 26 14 DK/NA 7 3 3 2 3
LIKELY VOTERS......................... Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Legitimate issue 34% 16% 53% 28% 32% 35% Unfair attack 60 79 40 64 61 59 DK/NA 7 4 7 7 7 6 Philly Urban SbUrbn ExUrbn land Shore Legitimate issue 41% 40% 23% 36% 26% Unfair attack 48 55 69 58 67 DK/NA 11 4 8 6 6