LIKELY VOTERS............................. Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Menendez 49% 8% 86% 45% 46% 51% Kean 45 89 11 44 48 42 SMONE ELSE(VOL) - - - 1 - 1 WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) - - - - - - DK/NA 6 3 2 10 6 6 Philly Urban SubUrbn ExUrbn land Shore Menendez 67% 57% 32% 40% 41% Kean 23 35 66 57 52 SMONE ELSE(VOL) 1 1 - - - WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) - - - - - DK/NA 9 7 2 3 7
LIKELY VOTERS Oct 12 Sep 20 2006 2006 Menendez 49 45 Kean Jr. 45 48 SMONE ELSE - 1 WLDN'T VOTE - - DK/NA 6 6
LIKELY CHOOSING CAND Q1................... CAND CHOICE Q1 Tot RM TK Rep Dem Ind Made up 81% 80% 83% 93% 80% 73% Might change 18 20 17 7 20 26 DK/NA - - - - - 1
LIKELY VOTERS Oct 12 Sep 20 2006 2006 Made up 81 70 Might change 18 29 DK/NA - 1
MENENDEZ SUPPORTERS................ LIKELY VOTERS ..................... Tot Dem Ind Men Wom For Menendez 65% 70% 55% 67% 62% Against Kean Jr. 28 22 37 25 30 DK/NA 8 8 8 8 8
KEAN SUPPORTERS.................... LIKELY VOTERS ..................... Tot Rep Ind Men Wom For Kean Jr. 50% 59% 39% 45% 57% Against Menendez 43 35 56 51 33 DK/NA 7 7 6 5 9
MENENDEZ SUPPORTERS................ LIKELY VOTERS ..................... Tot Dem Ind Men Wom A) Experience 19% 18% 23% 18% 19% B) Personal qualities 3 5 - 3 4 C) Stand on issues 56 57 49 52 61 OTHER(VOL) 17 16 22 23 11 DK/NA 4 4 5 4 4
LIKELY VOTERS...... Menendez Supporters Oct 12 Sep 20 2006 2006 A) Experience 19 15 B) Personal qualities 3 4 C) Stand on issues 56 52 OTHER(VOL) 17 20 DK/NA 4 8
KEAN SUPPORTERS.................... LIKELY VOTERS...................... Tot Rep Ind Men Wom A) Personal qualities 10 8 12 8 13 B) Son of Gov Tom Kean 10 7 11 8 12 C) Stand on the issues 55 63 48 58 53 OTHER(VOL) 20 18 27 22 18 DK/NA 4 3 3 5 4
LIKELY VOTERS.. Kean Supporters Oct 12 Sep 20 2006 2006 A) Personal qualities 10 9 B) Son of Gov Tom Kean 10 18 C) Stand on issues 55 52 OTHER(VOL) 20 15 DK/NA 4 6
LIKELY VOTERS.............................. Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Favorable 32% 8% 56% 26% 32% 32% Unfavorable 32 62 8 31 38 25 Mixed 22 14 23 29 19 25 Hvn't hrd enough 13 16 12 12 10 17 REFUSED 1 1 1 2 2 1 Philly Urban SubUrbn ExUrbn land Shore Favorable 37% 38% 24% 30% 25% Unfavorable 23 27 41 33 39 Mixed 28 24 17 20 18 Hvn't hrd enough 12 9 16 17 18 REFUSED 1 2 2 1 0
LIKELY VOTERS Oct 12 Sep 20 2006 2006 Favorable 32 24 Unfavorable 32 26 Mixed 22 20 Hvn't hrd enough 13 29 REFUSED 1 2
LIKELY VOTERS.............................. Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Favorable 34% 63% 15% 31% 37% 30% Unfavorable 18 6 30 16 16 21 Mixed 25 21 22 31 25 25 Hvn't hrd enough 22 10 32 20 21 22 REFUSED 2 1 1 2 1 2 Philly Urban SubUrbn ExUrbn land Shore Favorable 21% 26% 41% 46% 41% Unfavorable 28 18 8 19 19 Mixed 26 25 29 19 24 Hvn't hrd enough 25 27 22 13 16 REFUSED - 3 - 2 -
LIKELY VOTERS Oct 12 Sep 20 2006 2006 Favorable 34 26 Unfavorable 18 14 Mixed 25 22 Hvn't hrd enough 22 37 REFUSED 2 1
LIKELY VOTERS.............................. Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Yes 51% 75% 38% 46% 53% 49% No 18 10 22 22 19 18 DK/NA 30 15 40 32 28 33 Philly Urban SubUrbn ExUrbn land Shore Yes 40% 44% 67% 57% 56% No 23 21 14 18 16 DK/NA 37 36 19 26 28
LIKELY VOTERS Oct 12 Sep 20 2006 2006 Yes 51 50 No 18 13 DK/NA 30 37
LIKELY VOTERS.............................. Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Yes 38% 19% 61% 29% 35% 41% No 39 56 18 45 46 31 DK/NA 24 25 21 26 19 28 Philly Urban SubUrbn ExUrbn land Shore Yes 42% 41% 34% 38% 31% No 34 38 43 37 44 DK/NA 24 22 24 26 25
LIKELY VOTERS Oct 12 Sep 20 2006 2006 Yes 38 39 No 39 29 DK/NA 24 32
LIKELY VOTERS.............................. Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Yes 76% 78% 72% 78% 83% 68% No 24 21 28 22 17 31 DK/NA - 1 - - - 1 Philly Urban SubUrbn ExUrbn land Shore Yes 70% 79% 79% 70% 77% No 29 21 20 30 23 DK/NA 1 - 1 - -
LIKELY VOTERS "HEARD" Q11 ................. Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom More likely 4% 1% 8% 3% 4% 4% Less likely 49 72 23 57 52 46 No difference 44 25 67 36 41 47 DK/NA 3 2 2 4 3 4 Philly Urban SubUrbn ExUrbn land Shore More likely 8% 1% 4% 6% 5% Less likely 40 48 57 47 53 No difference 49 48 36 41 40 DK/NA 3 3 3 5 2
LIKELY VOTERS "HEARD" Q11 ................. Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom A) Serious 57% 83% 32% 59% 61% 51% B) Smear campaign 33 11 56 31 31 37 DK/NA 10 6 12 10 8 12 Philly Urban SubUrbn ExUrbn land Shore A) Serious 49% 51% 63% 62% 63% B) Smear campaign 42 37 29 26 29 DK/NA 8 11 8 12 9
LIKELY VOTERS.............................. Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Too often 39% 10% 60% 39% 36% 41% Not enough 9 13 9 7 9 9 About right 42 68 23 40 46 37 DK/NA 11 9 8 14 9 12 Philly Urban SubUrbn ExUrbn land Shore Too often 47% 45% 27% 37% 31% Not enough 7 7 12 7 13 About right 36 37 49 45 46 DK/NA 9 11 12 11 9
LIKELY VOTERS.............................. Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Approve 38% 77% 11% 35% 40% 36% Disapprove 57 16 87 60 55 60 DK/NA 4 7 2 6 5 4
LIKELY VOTERS.............................. Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Approve 32% 73% 6% 27% 37% 27% Disapprove 63 22 93 64 59 66 DK/NA 5 6 1 8 4 6
LIKELY VOTERS.............................. Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Right thing 39% 72% 13% 39% 41% 36% Wrong thing 56 18 84 57 54 58 DK/NA 5 10 3 4 5 6
LIKELY VOTERS.............................. Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom A) Increase troops 24% 37% 11% 27% 30% 17% B) Keep same amount 18 38 6 16 20 16 C) Decrease troops 21 10 30 20 19 23 D) Remove all troops 29 6 46 27 24 34 DK/NA 9 9 8 11 8 10
LIKELY VOTERS.............................. Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Winning 27% 52% 7% 26% 28% 25% Losing 55 18 81 58 51 59 DK/NA 19 30 12 16 20 17
LIKELY VOTERS.............................. Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Winning 43% 71% 23% 40% 46% 39% Losing 39 14 59 38 36 43 DK/NA 18 15 18 22 18 18