Tot LIKELY VOTERS....................................... Reg Tot Rep Dem Ind Wht Blk Hisp Favorable 34% 39% 16% 51% 24% 36% 52% 22% Unfavorable 17 20 52 11 22 22 12 27 Mixed 33 34 25 32 45 39 27 29 Hvn't hrd enough 14 6 8 5 9 3 6 18 REFUSED 2 1 - 1 - - 2 3
Tot LIKELY VOTERS....................................... Reg Tot Rep Dem Ind Wht Blk Hisp Favorable 33% 35% 72% 21% 40% 40% 22% 45% Unfavorable 16 20 6 27 13 20 18 16 Mixed 26 28 18 31 30 30 28 17 Hvn't hrd enough 23 15 4 17 16 8 30 20 REFUSED 2 2 - 3 1 2 2 3
Tot LIKELY VOTERS....................................... Reg Tot Rep Dem Ind Wht Blk Hisp Green 49% 51% 13% 71% 36% 47% 66% 41% Bloomberg 35 35 84 16 50 42 19 44 SMONE ELSE(VOL) 2 1 - 1 2 2 2 2 WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 1 - - - - - - - DK/NA 13 12 3 12 12 10 13 14
LIKELY VOTERS ......... Green Bloomberg Voters Voters Made up 69% 71% Might change 30 28 DK/NA 1 -
LIKELY VOTERS ......... Green Bloomberg Voters Voters Strongly favor 34% 46% Like with reservations 48 32 Dislike other candidate 14 21 DK/NA 4 -
Tot LIKELY VOTERS....................................... Reg Tot Rep Dem Ind Wht Blk Hisp Leadership qualities 1% 1% - 1% 1% 1% 1% - Intelligent/ Knowledgeable 2 4 - 5 4 6 - - Good speaker 2 2 - 2 4 2 3 - Political exp. 25 31 20 35 33 35 25 26 Good political record 4 5 1 7 5 4 8 3 Stand on issues (general) 2 2 - 3 3 3 2 2 Stand on education 8 9 3 12 7 9 11 5 Stand on economy 1 1 - 1 - 1 2 - Stand on health care 1 1 - 1 - - 1 2 Honesty/Integrity/ Character/Trust 3 3 - 5 1 3 5 2 Compassionate/ Cares for people 2 2 - 3 - 2 1 1 Personality/ Style/Charisma 1 1 - 1 1 1 2 - Aggressive/Strong/ Fights for what he believes in 2 2 - 3 2 3 2 - Supports/Fights for poor 1 - 1 - - - 1 2 Party 6 6 3 9 - 6 6 7 Political Philosophy 2 2 - 4 - 3 1 - Good endorsements 1 1 - 1 2 2 1 - Knows NYC 1 2 1 2 3 1 3 - Not like Guiliani 1 1 - 1 1 1 2 - Lead rebuilding of NYC 1 2 - 3 - 3 1 - Other 16 19 8 21 16 17 23 13 DK/NA 43 37 66 25 39 36 27 55
Tot LIKELY VOTERS....................................... Reg Tot Rep Dem Ind Wht Blk Hisp Lack of leadership qualities 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 3% 1% 1% Not intelligent/ Not knowledgeable 1 1 3 - 1 1 1 - Weak on issues/ vague/indecisive 1 1 - - 1 - 2 3 Flip-flops on issues 1 2 3 1 2 2 2 2 Lacking exp./ Political record 3 4 5 3 6 6 2 3 Poor record 1 1 2 - 1 1 1 1 Insider/Typical pol 2 3 3 1 8 4 2 3 Stand on issues(gen) 1 1 - - 1 1 - - Stand on education 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 Stand on crime 1 1 1 - 2 1 1 - Stand on race rel 1 1 - - 2 1 1 - Lack of support for NYPD 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 - Lacking honesty/ Integrity/Trust 3 4 5 2 6 3 1 9 Personality/Style 2 3 - 4 3 4 1 3 Arrogant/Smug 3 5 1 6 6 8 1 - Racialy divisive 1 1 - 1 1 - - 2 Party 1 1 3 - 1 1 1 - Political philosophy 4 6 17 2 10 10 - 3 Campaign style 2 3 1 4 1 2 4 1 Campaign vs Ferrer 2 2 2 2 3 1 3 1 Not like Guiliani 1 1 3 1 - 2 - 2 Support of Guiliani extension 2 2 - 3 2 2 5 - Just don't like him 1 1 5 - 1 1 1 2 Other 17 23 29 18 26 23 15 23 DK/NA 58 47 31 56 35 37 65 54
Tot LIKELY VOTERS....................................... Reg Tot Rep Dem Ind Wht Blk Hisp Leadership qualities 4% 4% 11% 2% 4% 3% 2% 9% Intelligent/ Knowledgeable 2 2 7 1 1 3 1 1 Good speaker 1 1 - 1 - 1 1 - Independent/Not insider pol/ fresh face 5 6 8 3 10 7 3 6 Doesn't owe favors/ Can't be bribed 2 3 5 2 2 3 3 - Stand on education 2 1 - 1 1 - 2 5 Stand on economy 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 - Stand on crime 1 1 3 - 1 1 - - Honesty/Integrity/ Character/Trust 2 3 4 2 4 2 2 6 Compassionate/Cares for people 1 1 1 - 1 - 3 - Personality/ Style/Charisma 1 1 - 1 1 - 1 4 Aggressive/Strong/ Fights for what he believes in 1 1 - 1 1 1 2 - Selfmade man/ Hard-worker 2 2 4 2 2 3 2 4 Party 1 1 - 1 1 - 2 - Political Phil 1 - 1 - 1 1 - - Business exp/ Management skills 36 40 47 35 53 44 34 40 Background good for NYC economy 10 11 13 10 12 12 10 16 Wealthy 2 2 4 2 2 1 2 3 Knows NYC 1 1 1 - - - 2 - More like Guiliani 3 2 9 - 2 3 - 2 Will rebuild NYC 2 2 3 1 3 2 2 2 Other 11 13 16 9 17 16 9 8 DK/NA 40 34 20 43 21 29 43 36
Tot LIKELY VOTERS....................................... Reg Tot Rep Dem Ind Wht Blk Hisp Uncooperative/ Not team-player/ Dictator 1% 2% 3% 1% 2% 2% - 1% Lacking exp/ Political record 31 37 27 39 40 47 21 17 Stand on education 1 1 - 1 - - 2 - Stand on race rel 1 1 - - 2 - 2 - Lacking honesty/ Integrity/Trust 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 - Not compassionate/ Doesn't care about people 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 - Arrogant/Smug 1 2 - 3 1 2 2 1 Party 3 4 3 6 1 4 3 3 Political phil 1 1 - 1 1 1 - 2 Too rich/wealthy/ spoiled 3 3 1 4 2 4 2 3 Out of touch with average New Yorker 1 2 1 1 3 2 1 1 Policies will favor rich over middle/ lower classes 2 2 - 3 1 2 1 1 Represents big business 1 2 - 2 2 2 2 2 Buying election 1 1 - 2 1 2 - 3 More like Guiliani 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 - Other 10 11 11 11 11 12 10 10 DK/NA 49 41 59 36 40 33 55 57
Tot LIKELY VOTERS....................................... Reg Tot Rep Dem Ind Wht Blk Hisp Experience and qualities 43% 41% 53% 40% 39% 38% 44% 48% Positions on issues 47 47 41 46 49 50 44 44 DK/NA 10 12 7 14 12 12 12 8
Tot LIKELY VOTERS....................................... Reg Tot Rep Dem Ind Wht Blk Hisp Yes 58% 62% 55% 72% 51% 65% 71% 45% No 22 24 37 15 30 24 18 33 DK/NA 20 14 8 13 19 11 11 22
Tot LIKELY VOTERS....................................... Reg Tot Rep Dem Ind Wht Blk Hisp Yes 60% 59% 52% 64% 53% 51% 78% 61% No 28 32 39 27 36 39 15 23 DK/NA 12 10 9 9 11 10 7 16
Tot LIKELY VOTERS....................................... Reg Tot Rep Dem Ind Wht Blk Hisp Yes 64% 66% 37% 81% 53% 66% 68% 60% No 21 25 55 10 36 27 19 24 DK/NA 15 10 8 9 11 7 13 17
Tot LIKELY VOTERS....................................... Reg Tot Rep Dem Ind Wht Blk Hisp Yes 69% 71% 41% 84% 64% 70% 80% 56% No 18 22 53 10 28 25 16 28 DK/NA 13 6 5 6 7 6 5 16
Tot LIKELY VOTERS....................................... Reg Tot Rep Dem Ind Wht Blk Hisp Yes 51% 52% 32% 64% 43% 45% 66% 48% No 27 31 58 19 38 37 20 32 DK/NA 22 17 10 17 19 18 14 20
Tot LIKELY VOTERS....................................... Reg Tot Rep Dem Ind Wht Blk Hisp Yes 55% 59% 17% 77% 50% 57% 69% 50% No 30 33 76 15 42 37 19 34 DK/NA 16 8 8 8 9 6 12 16
Tot LIKELY VOTERS....................................... Reg Tot Rep Dem Ind Wht Blk Hisp Yes 59% 62% 85% 54% 68% 67% 54% 65% No 13 13 9 16 10 11 15 17 DK/NA 28 24 6 30 22 22 31 18
Tot LIKELY VOTERS....................................... Reg Tot Rep Dem Ind Wht Blk Hisp Yes 59% 59% 79% 53% 60% 56% 61% 69% No 20 21 6 24 24 25 17 15 DK/NA 21 20 14 22 17 19 22 16
Tot LIKELY VOTERS....................................... Reg Tot Rep Dem Ind Wht Blk Hisp Yes 47% 47% 77% 36% 54% 52% 39% 48% No 29 31 13 39 24 30 35 23 DK/NA 24 22 10 26 22 19 26 29
Tot LIKELY VOTERS....................................... Reg Tot Rep Dem Ind Wht Blk Hisp Yes 41% 42% 72% 29% 50% 39% 46% 44% No 40 44 18 57 35 49 41 32 DK/NA 20 14 10 14 15 12 13 23
Tot LIKELY VOTERS....................................... Reg Tot Rep Dem Ind Wht Blk Hisp Yes 73% 77% 86% 68% 90% 78% 72% 84% No 12 12 8 17 3 11 15 8 DK/NA 15 12 7 15 7 11 13 7
Tot LIKELY VOTERS....................................... Reg Tot Rep Dem Ind Wht Blk Hisp Yes 44% 48% 86% 33% 59% 52% 41% 46% No 32 33 6 43 24 30 37 30 DK/NA 24 20 8 24 17 18 22 24
Tot LIKELY VOTERS....................................... Reg Tot Rep Dem Ind Wht Blk Hisp Bloomberg 31% 34% 65% 19% 45% 35% 29% 43% Green 50 50 23 67 35 50 56 39 DK/NA 19 16 12 14 20 16 16 18
Tot LIKELY VOTERS....................................... Reg Tot Rep Dem Ind Wht Blk Hisp Bloomberg 55% 57% 85% 42% 71% 60% 48% 62% Green 29 28 10 40 15 25 35 24 DK/NA 17 15 4 18 14 15 17 13
Tot LIKELY VOTERS....................................... Reg Tot Rep Dem Ind Wht Blk Hisp Bloomberg 36% 37% 68% 22% 52% 42% 21% 46% Green 43 44 23 59 28 39 61 39 DK/NA 21 18 9 19 20 19 17 14
Tot LIKELY VOTERS....................................... Reg Tot Rep Dem Ind Wht Blk Hisp Bloomberg 61% 62% 84% 49% 74% 65% 54% 72% Green 25 24 9 35 15 21 37 19 DK/NA 14 13 7 16 10 15 10 8
Tot LIKELY VOTERS....................................... Reg Tot Rep Dem Ind Wht Blk Hisp Approve 79% 78% 94% 74% 78% 86% 60% 85% Disapprove 17 20 6 23 19 13 35 12 DK/NA 4 3 - 3 4 1 5 3