Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Approve 44% 61% 33% 46% 43% 44% Disapprove 43 30 53 42 45 42 DK/NA 13 9 14 13 12 14 UpState..... UpState Urban Othr Total NYC Sub Approve 32% 38% 37% 41% 61% Disapprove 60 51 53 43 26 DK/NA 8 11 10 16 13
Highest Lowest Approve Approve Oct 4 Aug 23 Jun 21 May 17 Mar 29 Oct 2 May 17 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2001 2006 Approve 44 39 39 33 45 81 33 Disapprove 43 46 45 55 44 12 55 DK/NA 13 15 15 12 12 7 12
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Approve 65% 55% 71% 65% 70% 61% Disapprove 18 28 15 16 18 19 DK/NA 17 17 15 19 12 20 UpState..... UpState Urban Othr Total NYC Sub Approve 75% 64% 66% 64% 64% Disapprove 19 20 20 18 18 DK/NA 6 16 14 18 18
Highest Lowest Approve Approve Oct 4 Aug 23 Jun 21 May 17 Mar 29 Jun 21 Apr 6 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2000 Approve 65 63 69 66 66 69 51 Disapprove 18 17 17 21 18 17 14 DK/NA 17 20 14 14 16 14 35
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Approve 37% 34% 42% 33% 37% 37% Disapprove 23 26 19 24 25 20 DK/NA 40 40 39 44 37 43 UpState..... UpState Urban Othr Total NYC Sub Approve 44% 29% 32% 43% 38% Disapprove 27 25 26 22 18 DK/NA 29 45 43 36 44
Highest Lowest Approve Approve Oct 4 Jun 21 May 17 Mar 29 Dec 8 Mar 29 Oct 4 2006 2006 2006 2006 2004 2006 2006 Approve 37 45 46 47 41 47 37 Disapprove 23 18 17 15 17 15 23 DK/NA 40 37 36 38 42 38 40
Likely Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Voters Favorable 49% 39% 59% 49% 55% 45% 57% Unfavorable 9 19 3 7 10 8 10 Mixed 17 19 14 18 16 19 17 Hvn't hrd enough 24 23 23 25 19 27 16 REFUSED 1 - - - 1 - - UpState..... UpState Urban Othr Total NYC Sub Favorable 51% 49% 49% 51% 48% Unfavorable 11 12 12 6 8 Mixed 6 20 17 17 18 Hvn't hrd enough 31 19 21 26 26 REFUSED 2 1 1 - 1
Oct 4 Aug 23 Jun 21 May 17 Mar 29 Jan 19 May 5 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2005 Favorable 49 50 52 51 51 52 41 Unfavorable 9 8 11 11 11 10 8 Mixed 17 16 16 17 16 16 20 Hvn't heard enough 24 26 20 21 22 21 30 REFUSED 1 - 1 1 - 1 1
Likely Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Voters Favorable 9% 11% 7% 9% 12% 6% 11% Unfavorable 7 2 12 6 10 6 9 Mixed 9 8 9 9 8 10 10 Hvn't hrd enough 73 77 71 75 68 78 70 REFUSED 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 UpState..... UpState Urban Othr Total NYC Sub Favorable 7% 10% 9% 7% 10% Unfavorable 5 8 8 8 6 Mixed 17 9 10 8 8 Hvn't hrd enough 71 72 72 75 74 REFUSED 1 1 1 1 1
Oct 4 Aug 23 Jun 21 May 17 Mar 29 Jan 19 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 Favorable 9 7 8 6 6 7 Unfavorable 7 6 7 6 4 6 Mixed 9 8 11 13 10 10 Hvn't heard enough 73 78 73 74 78 76 REFUSED 1 1 1 2 1 1
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Spitzer 69% 41% 90% 67% 68% 70% Faso 18 47 2 14 21 15 SMONE ELSE(VOL) 1 - 1 1 1 1 WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 2 1 1 4 3 1 DK/NA 10 11 6 14 7 13 UpState..... UpState Urban Othr Total NYC Sub Spitzer 73% 64% 65% 76% 64% Faso 15 21 20 11 23 SMONE ELSE(VOL) 2 1 1 1 - WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 2 2 2 3 1 DK/NA 8 12 11 9 11
Oct 4 Aug 23 Jun 21 May 17 Mar 29 Jan 19 Dec 14 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2006 2005 Spitzer 69 65 66 67 66 61 64 Faso 18 17 20 16 18 19 14 SMONE ELSE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 WLDN'T VOTE 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 DK/NA 10 15 11 14 13 18 21
LIKELY VOTERS............................... Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Spitzer 73% 40% 94% 75% 71% 75% Faso 21 54 3 18 25 19 SMONE ELSE(VOL) - - - 1 - - WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) - - - - - - DK/NA 5 6 3 7 4 6 UpState..... UpState Urban Othr Total NYC Sub Spitzer 78% 69% 71% 80% 67% Faso 20 25 24 14 27 SMONE ELSE(VOL) - - - 1 - WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) - - - - - DK/NA 3 5 5 5 6
LIKELY CHOOSING CAND Q8.. CAND OF CHOICE Q8 Tot ES JF Made up 69% 71% 59% Might change 30 27 40 DK/NA 1 1 1
Likely Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Voters Favorable 23% 17% 29% 22% 26% 22% 27% Unfavorable 8 12 5 9 10 7 10 Mixed 21 18 20 23 20 21 22 Hvn't hrd enough 47 53 45 46 43 50 41 REFUSED - - 1 - 1 - - UpState..... UpState Urban Othr Total NYC Sub Favorable 17% 16% 16% 31% 26% Unfavorable 8 9 9 8 7 Mixed 20 19 19 22 21 Hvn't hrd enough 55 55 55 39 45 REFUSED - 1 1 - 1
Likely Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Voters Favorable 4% 6% 4% 4% 6% 3% 5% Unfavorable 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 Mixed 6 4 7 4 6 6 6 Hvn't hrd enough 88 87 86 90 85 89 87 REFUSED 1 1 1 1 2 - 1 UpState..... UpState Urban Othr Total NYC Sub Favorable 6% 4% 4% 5% 3% Unfavorable 3 1 1 2 1 Mixed 6 5 5 7 3 Hvn't hrd enough 85 89 89 84 92 REFUSED - 1 - 2 0
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Hevesi 51% 24% 74% 44% 51% 51% Callaghan 18 42 3 18 20 16 SMONE ELSE(VOL) 1 1 - 1 1 1 WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 4 3 3 5 4 4 DK/NA 26 29 20 32 24 28 UpState..... UpState Urban Othr Total NYC Sub Hevesi 45% 41% 42% 62% 51% Callaghan 19 22 21 12 20 SMONE ELSE(VOL) 1 1 1 1 1 WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 8 5 5 4 1 DK/NA 28 31 31 22 26
LIKELY VOTERS............................... Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom Hevesi 59% 29% 80% 56% 60% 59% Callaghan 21 50 4 21 21 21 SMONE ELSE(VOL) 1 - 1 1 - 1 WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 1 1 1 - 1 1 DK/NA 18 19 14 22 18 18 UpState..... UpState Urban Othr Total NYC Sub Hevesi 55% 49% 50% 72% 58% Callaghan 24 26 26 14 23 SMONE ELSE(VOL) 1 - 1 1 - WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 1 1 1 - - DK/NA 19 23 22 13 19
LIKELY CHOOSING CAND Q17.. CAND OF CHOICE Q17 Tot AH CC Made up 58% 59% 53% Might change 41 40 45 DK/NA 1 1 1
Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Wom A) ES can fix NY gov problem 63% 49% 74% 63% 65% 61% B) ES is part of NY gov problem 17 24 11 20 19 16 NO PROBLEMS(VOL) 1 1 - 1 1 1 DK/NA 19 26 15 16 15 22 UpState..... UpState Urban Othr Total NYC Sub A) ES can fix NY gov problem 63% 59% 60% 66% 63% B) ES is part of NY gov problem 17 23 22 15 13 NO PROBLEMS(VOL) - 2 1 1 - DK/NA 20 16 17 19 23